<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 378 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402786</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the findings against them by the tribunal. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 115JB regarding disallowance of indirect expenditure under Section 14A for MAT purposes, the applicability of Section 14A in computing book profit under Section 115JB, and the treatment of exempt income under Sections 10(2A) and 10(35) in relation to expenditure disallowance under Section 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 378 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402786</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the findings against them by the tribunal. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 115JB regarding disallowance of indirect expenditure under Section 14A for MAT purposes, the applicability of Section 14A in computing book profit under Section 115JB, and the treatment of exempt income under Sections 10(2A) and 10(35) in relation to expenditure disallowance under Section 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>