https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402785 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the need to file an appeal against the intimation under the Income Tax Act within the specified timeframe. The denial of relief under Section 89(1) was deemed crucial, and the rejection of the rectification application was contested. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the appropriate remedy by filing an appeal within three weeks, ensuring compliance with appeal provisions and allowing for a decision on the appeal's merits. en-us Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:17:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402785 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the need to file an appeal against the intimation under the Income Tax Act within the specified timeframe. The denial of relief under Section 89(1) was deemed crucial, and the rejection of the rectification application was contested. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the appropriate remedy by filing an appeal within three weeks, ensuring compliance with appeal provisions and allowing for a decision on the appeal's merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402785