<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1382 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292916</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal seeking restoration of a company&#039;s name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company failed to comply with statutory requirements by not filing financial statements and annual returns, leading to its strike off. Despite the appellant&#039;s claims of business activity, examination of financial statements and bank transactions revealed no evidence of ongoing operations. The Tribunal applied judicial principles requiring proof of business activity for restoration and found no basis to restore the company&#039;s name, ultimately dismissing the appeal with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:16:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1382 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292916</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal seeking restoration of a company&#039;s name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company failed to comply with statutory requirements by not filing financial statements and annual returns, leading to its strike off. Despite the appellant&#039;s claims of business activity, examination of financial statements and bank transactions revealed no evidence of ongoing operations. The Tribunal applied judicial principles requiring proof of business activity for restoration and found no basis to restore the company&#039;s name, ultimately dismissing the appeal with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>