<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1927 (3) TMI 8 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292894</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad reversed the Subordinate Judge&#039;s decree in a pre-emption claim case involving village shares. The Court dismissed the case on appeal, ruling against the co-sharer&#039;s claim against a buyer from the assignee in bankruptcy of another co-sharer. The judgment highlighted the custom of pre-emption among co-sharers, emphasizing the significance of entries in the village records. The Board criticized the High Court&#039;s decision on the inapplicability of pre-emption against a sale by an Official Assignee in bankruptcy, recommending that the appeal be allowed, restoring the Subordinate Judge&#039;s judgment, and awarding costs to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:04:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1927 (3) TMI 8 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292894</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad reversed the Subordinate Judge&#039;s decree in a pre-emption claim case involving village shares. The Court dismissed the case on appeal, ruling against the co-sharer&#039;s claim against a buyer from the assignee in bankruptcy of another co-sharer. The judgment highlighted the custom of pre-emption among co-sharers, emphasizing the significance of entries in the village records. The Board criticized the High Court&#039;s decision on the inapplicability of pre-emption against a sale by an Official Assignee in bankruptcy, recommending that the appeal be allowed, restoring the Subordinate Judge&#039;s judgment, and awarding costs to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>