https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292893 Revenue mutations in favour of religious institutions require proof that the land falls within the governing grant or direction and that statutory conditions for altering records of rights are satisfied. Land Revenue Act requirements were not met where private ownership entries were changed without evidence that the land was attached to the institutions, the parties' agreement, or a binding decree or order; the mutation orders were therefore quashed. Article 226 relief remained available because a civil suit was not an adequate and efficacious remedy given the dispute's nature, public importance, and potential prejudice from wrongful revenue entries. Relief was confined to the revenue authority, and the Government was not subjected to relief. en-us Fri, 05 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Apr 2022 14:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292893 Revenue mutations in favour of religious institutions require proof that the land falls within the governing grant or direction and that statutory conditions for altering records of rights are satisfied. Land Revenue Act requirements were not met where private ownership entries were changed without evidence that the land was attached to the institutions, the parties' agreement, or a binding decree or order; the mutation orders were therefore quashed. Article 226 relief remained available because a civil suit was not an adequate and efficacious remedy given the dispute's nature, public importance, and potential prejudice from wrongful revenue entries. Relief was confined to the revenue authority, and the Government was not subjected to relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Dec 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292893