<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1834 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292884</link>
    <description>Bail was refused in a serious economic offence involving alleged large-scale cheating, forgery, criminal conspiracy and diversion of investor funds. The Court applied settled bail principles, giving weight to the gravity of the allegations, the continuing investigation into the money trail, the accused&#039;s position, and the risk of fleeing or obstructing justice. Credible material indicated forged sale documents, sham transactions, diversion through intermediary entities, and a real apprehension of tampering with evidence and hindering further investigation. On those facts, the petitioners were held not entitled to release on bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1834 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292884</link>
      <description>Bail was refused in a serious economic offence involving alleged large-scale cheating, forgery, criminal conspiracy and diversion of investor funds. The Court applied settled bail principles, giving weight to the gravity of the allegations, the continuing investigation into the money trail, the accused&#039;s position, and the risk of fleeing or obstructing justice. Credible material indicated forged sale documents, sham transactions, diversion through intermediary entities, and a real apprehension of tampering with evidence and hindering further investigation. On those facts, the petitioners were held not entitled to release on bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>