<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1285 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application to exclude 60 days in the Resolution Process, emphasizing the need for substantial progress within the stipulated timeline. With no Resolution Plan forthcoming, the Corporate Debtor was ordered into liquidation. The Tribunal directed the appointment of a Liquidator, stressing compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:14:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1285 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application to exclude 60 days in the Resolution Process, emphasizing the need for substantial progress within the stipulated timeline. With no Resolution Plan forthcoming, the Corporate Debtor was ordered into liquidation. The Tribunal directed the appointment of a Liquidator, stressing compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>