https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292886 The court addressed the challenge to director disqualification under section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2013, emphasizing adherence to legal provisions, timelines, and principles of natural justice. Relief was granted to the petitioner, setting aside the impugned orders and enabling the petitioner to hold directorship in other companies, similar to relief granted in previous related cases. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:14:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292886 The court addressed the challenge to director disqualification under section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2013, emphasizing adherence to legal provisions, timelines, and principles of natural justice. Relief was granted to the petitioner, setting aside the impugned orders and enabling the petitioner to hold directorship in other companies, similar to relief granted in previous related cases. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292886