<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 83 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24271</link>
    <description>A tariff or schedule entry that qualifies a series of goods by a descriptive condition must be read as a whole on its plain language. On that construction, the words &quot;made wholly or mainly of cotton&quot; governed the entire entry in item 32, including hosiery and rope, and could not be confined only to cotton yarn. The entry therefore did not extend to woollen hosiery, and the assessee was entitled only to the residuary 15% development rebate rather than the 25% rate under the special schedule item.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:33:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 83 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24271</link>
      <description>A tariff or schedule entry that qualifies a series of goods by a descriptive condition must be read as a whole on its plain language. On that construction, the words &quot;made wholly or mainly of cotton&quot; governed the entire entry in item 32, including hosiery and rope, and could not be confined only to cotton yarn. The entry therefore did not extend to woollen hosiery, and the assessee was entitled only to the residuary 15% development rebate rather than the 25% rate under the special schedule item.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>