<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 410 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292873</link>
    <description>The order gives effect to the connected judgment by directing that the employee continue in service and be confirmed in the post to which she was appointed, with confirmation taking effect from the date it would have arisen in the normal course. It further directs payment of salary and any arrears due on that basis, and provides for enforcement if the management fails to comply within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:58:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 410 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292873</link>
      <description>The order gives effect to the connected judgment by directing that the employee continue in service and be confirmed in the post to which she was appointed, with confirmation taking effect from the date it would have arisen in the normal course. It further directs payment of salary and any arrears due on that basis, and provides for enforcement if the management fails to comply within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>