<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 661 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292872</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, emphasizing the need for corresponding adjustments in opening stock as per judicial precedents and directing verification of the exclusion of capital goods amount. The ITAT upheld the CIT(Appeals) direction for the exclusion of the capital goods amount if found correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:12:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 661 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292872</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, emphasizing the need for corresponding adjustments in opening stock as per judicial precedents and directing verification of the exclusion of capital goods amount. The ITAT upheld the CIT(Appeals) direction for the exclusion of the capital goods amount if found correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>