https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402740 The case involved the issue of whether GST should be charged on establishment charges only after abatement of wages paid to security guards and the eligibility of the applicant to take GST credit under this method. The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) determined that GST should be charged on the entire amount received from clients, including wages and establishment charges, at the rate of 18%. The AAR clarified that following this method would make the applicant eligible to take GST credit, provided they comply with the conditions and provisions of the CGST Act, 2017, and CGST Rules, 2017. en-us Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Jul 2021 13:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402740 The case involved the issue of whether GST should be charged on establishment charges only after abatement of wages paid to security guards and the eligibility of the applicant to take GST credit under this method. The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) determined that GST should be charged on the entire amount received from clients, including wages and establishment charges, at the rate of 18%. The AAR clarified that following this method would make the applicant eligible to take GST credit, provided they comply with the conditions and provisions of the CGST Act, 2017, and CGST Rules, 2017. Case-Laws GST Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402740