https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402725 The court found the writ petition maintainable due to the inefficacy of civil remedies in cases of default in filing annual returns by Directors of a Yogam under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. It held that Directors failing to file annual returns for consecutive years would be disqualified for reappointment for five years. The court directed the Inspector General of Registration to decide on the petitioner's representation within three months, ensuring affected parties have a hearing and can submit additional documents or pleadings if necessary. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:05:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402725 The court found the writ petition maintainable due to the inefficacy of civil remedies in cases of default in filing annual returns by Directors of a Yogam under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. It held that Directors failing to file annual returns for consecutive years would be disqualified for reappointment for five years. The court directed the Inspector General of Registration to decide on the petitioner's representation within three months, ensuring affected parties have a hearing and can submit additional documents or pleadings if necessary. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402725