<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 314 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW  TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by M/s. Urvashi Infrastructure Limited seeking restoration in the register maintained by the Registrar of Companies. The company was struck off due to defaults in filing financial statements, with evidence showing no business activity. The Tribunal emphasized the need for operational status or just cause for restoration, referencing a judgment by the NCLAT. Due to insufficient evidence of operations, the Tribunal upheld the RoC&#039;s decision to strike off the company, aligning with legal principles outlined in the NCLAT judgment. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was to be shared with the parties for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:05:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 314 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW  TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by M/s. Urvashi Infrastructure Limited seeking restoration in the register maintained by the Registrar of Companies. The company was struck off due to defaults in filing financial statements, with evidence showing no business activity. The Tribunal emphasized the need for operational status or just cause for restoration, referencing a judgment by the NCLAT. Due to insufficient evidence of operations, the Tribunal upheld the RoC&#039;s decision to strike off the company, aligning with legal principles outlined in the NCLAT judgment. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was to be shared with the parties for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>