https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402713 Conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not interfered with because the revision was confined to sentence and the accused did not challenge the finding of guilt on merits. The Court then held that imprisonment remained warranted, but one year's simple imprisonment was excessive in the facts and disproportionate to the proven guilt; it reduced the custodial sentence to two months while maintaining the fine and modified default sentence. en-us Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jan 2021 08:04:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402713 Conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not interfered with because the revision was confined to sentence and the accused did not challenge the finding of guilt on merits. The Court then held that imprisonment remained warranted, but one year's simple imprisonment was excessive in the facts and disproportionate to the proven guilt; it reduced the custodial sentence to two months while maintaining the fine and modified default sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 04 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402713