<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1731 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292867</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting issues concerning Sections 80P and 68 back to the AO for fresh consideration. The Tribunal instructed the AO to reassess the assessee&#039;s activities for Section 80P deductions and directed the assessee to provide depositor identities for Section 68. The Stay Petition was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1731 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292867</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting issues concerning Sections 80P and 68 back to the AO for fresh consideration. The Tribunal instructed the AO to reassess the assessee&#039;s activities for Section 80P deductions and directed the assessee to provide depositor identities for Section 68. The Stay Petition was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>