<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 294 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402702</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the AO to reconsider the disallowance of rental expenses based on fair market value, not BBMP valuation, under section 40A(2)(b). Additionally, the Tribunal restricted the disallowance under section 14A to the amount originally claimed by the assessee, deleting the additional disallowance made by the Revenue authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:57:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 294 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402702</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the AO to reconsider the disallowance of rental expenses based on fair market value, not BBMP valuation, under section 40A(2)(b). Additionally, the Tribunal restricted the disallowance under section 14A to the amount originally claimed by the assessee, deleting the additional disallowance made by the Revenue authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>