<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 287 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directing the Assessing Officer to grant the exemption under Sec. 54F of the Income Tax Act. It held that registration was not mandatory for exemption and confirmed entitlement for multiple residential flats, aligning with pre-amendment provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 287 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directing the Assessing Officer to grant the exemption under Sec. 54F of the Income Tax Act. It held that registration was not mandatory for exemption and confirmed entitlement for multiple residential flats, aligning with pre-amendment provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>