<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 271 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the application by setting aside the decision to classify debts owed to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 as financial debts. Instead, the debts were categorized as operational debts, leading to a reworking of the creditors&#039; list in the Committee of Creditors. The request to exclude time from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was denied, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2021 20:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 271 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the application by setting aside the decision to classify debts owed to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 as financial debts. Instead, the debts were categorized as operational debts, leading to a reworking of the creditors&#039; list in the Committee of Creditors. The request to exclude time from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was denied, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>