<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 269 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402677</link>
    <description>The court adjourned the matter due to the respondent&#039;s counsel&#039;s unavailability and set a future hearing date. The core issue focused on the applicant&#039;s entitlement to benefits under the SVLDRS, with potential implications for the original order. The court emphasized fairness by indicating that if the respondent fails to appear at the next hearing, it will proceed with hearing the applicant&#039;s counsel and issue an appropriate order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2021 20:48:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 269 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402677</link>
      <description>The court adjourned the matter due to the respondent&#039;s counsel&#039;s unavailability and set a future hearing date. The core issue focused on the applicant&#039;s entitlement to benefits under the SVLDRS, with potential implications for the original order. The court emphasized fairness by indicating that if the respondent fails to appear at the next hearing, it will proceed with hearing the applicant&#039;s counsel and issue an appropriate order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>