<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1411 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292857</link>
    <description>Writ interference in SARFAESI recovery proceedings is ordinarily unwarranted where an effective statutory alternate remedy exists, and interim protection that stalls recovery should not be granted casually because it may prejudice secured creditors and public funds. Applying these settled principles, the text notes that no exceptional circumstance justified continuing the writ court&#039;s interim stay, and the stay of recovery proceedings was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2021 20:29:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1411 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292857</link>
      <description>Writ interference in SARFAESI recovery proceedings is ordinarily unwarranted where an effective statutory alternate remedy exists, and interim protection that stalls recovery should not be granted casually because it may prejudice secured creditors and public funds. Applying these settled principles, the text notes that no exceptional circumstance justified continuing the writ court&#039;s interim stay, and the stay of recovery proceedings was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>