https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292854 The court held that a writ petition under Article 226 challenging orders of Judicial/Civil Courts is not maintainable. Impleading the Judicial/Civil Court or its Presiding Officer in such petitions is unnecessary. Petitions under Article 227 do not require impleading the Judicial/Civil Court or its Presiding Officer, except in cases of allegations against the Presiding Officer. The Full Bench ruling in Ramchandra Dagoji Rangari on impleading the court/tribunal/authority in Article 226 petitions is no longer valid, except when the tribunal or authority needs to defend its order. en-us Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jan 2021 20:29:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292854 The court held that a writ petition under Article 226 challenging orders of Judicial/Civil Courts is not maintainable. Impleading the Judicial/Civil Court or its Presiding Officer in such petitions is unnecessary. Petitions under Article 227 do not require impleading the Judicial/Civil Court or its Presiding Officer, except in cases of allegations against the Presiding Officer. The Full Bench ruling in Ramchandra Dagoji Rangari on impleading the court/tribunal/authority in Article 226 petitions is no longer valid, except when the tribunal or authority needs to defend its order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292854