https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292839 A fact-dependent objection to a tribunal's jurisdiction, raised for the first time in writ proceedings after participation on merits, was held unavailable where the party had not objected at the earliest stage. Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act can succeed only on proof of a contravention of Section 33 during the pendency of proceedings. Non-payment of wages and bonus was treated as neither alteration of service conditions nor punishment under Section 33, while refusal of work amounting to lock-out fell within the separate scheme of Sections 23, 24 and 31(1). The award under Section 33A was therefore without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed. en-us Fri, 02 Mar 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292839 A fact-dependent objection to a tribunal's jurisdiction, raised for the first time in writ proceedings after participation on merits, was held unavailable where the party had not objected at the earliest stage. Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act can succeed only on proof of a contravention of Section 33 during the pendency of proceedings. Non-payment of wages and bonus was treated as neither alteration of service conditions nor punishment under Section 33, while refusal of work amounting to lock-out fell within the separate scheme of Sections 23, 24 and 31(1). The award under Section 33A was therefore without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Mar 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292839