<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (5) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292836</link>
    <description>A statutory appeal under the Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 was not available to a stranger to the proceeding, so the writ petition remained maintainable. The Industrial Tribunal had general power to award costs and, in appropriate cases, that power could extend to a non-party; however, the discretion had to be exercised on sound judicial principles and not capriciously. Because the employer was fastened with liability without notice or an opportunity of hearing, the order violated natural justice and was liable to be quashed in certiorari. The cost orders were therefore set aside and the petitioner was relieved from liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2021 13:07:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (5) TMI 29 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292836</link>
      <description>A statutory appeal under the Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 was not available to a stranger to the proceeding, so the writ petition remained maintainable. The Industrial Tribunal had general power to award costs and, in appropriate cases, that power could extend to a non-party; however, the discretion had to be exercised on sound judicial principles and not capriciously. Because the employer was fastened with liability without notice or an opportunity of hearing, the order violated natural justice and was liable to be quashed in certiorari. The cost orders were therefore set aside and the petitioner was relieved from liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>