<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (4) TMI 34 - HIGH COURT OF NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292831</link>
    <description>A speaking order of a rent control authority is amenable to certiorari when it ignores the governing statutory conditions or rests on an error of law on the face of the record. Here, the authorities failed to apply the clause requiring consideration of bona fide residential need and whether the landlord already occupied another residential house in the relevant city, so their orders were legally unsustainable and set aside. In supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226, the High Court should ordinarily correct the legal error by quashing the defective orders and remitting the matter for fresh decision by the statutory authority, rather than granting the substantive permission itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:46:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (4) TMI 34 - HIGH COURT OF NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292831</link>
      <description>A speaking order of a rent control authority is amenable to certiorari when it ignores the governing statutory conditions or rests on an error of law on the face of the record. Here, the authorities failed to apply the clause requiring consideration of bona fide residential need and whether the landlord already occupied another residential house in the relevant city, so their orders were legally unsustainable and set aside. In supervisory jurisdiction under Article 226, the High Court should ordinarily correct the legal error by quashing the defective orders and remitting the matter for fresh decision by the statutory authority, rather than granting the substantive permission itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>