https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292829 Full and frank disclosure is required before extraordinary writ relief is granted; suppression of a material fact in the supporting affidavit justified refusal of a writ of prohibition or certiorari. The text also states that proceedings under the Income-tax Act could not be halted by writ on a jurisdictional objection, because the assessing authority was entrusted with deciding the preliminary facts for action under the reassessment provision, while errors as to assessment or place of assessment were to be pursued through the Act's appellate and case-stated remedies. On that reasoning, collateral writ intervention was treated as unavailable. en-us Thu, 01 Jun 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:40:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292829 Full and frank disclosure is required before extraordinary writ relief is granted; suppression of a material fact in the supporting affidavit justified refusal of a writ of prohibition or certiorari. The text also states that proceedings under the Income-tax Act could not be halted by writ on a jurisdictional objection, because the assessing authority was entrusted with deciding the preliminary facts for action under the reassessment provision, while errors as to assessment or place of assessment were to be pursued through the Act's appellate and case-stated remedies. On that reasoning, collateral writ intervention was treated as unavailable. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 01 Jun 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292829