https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292830 Where a tribunal is authorised under an industrial dispute reference to decide whether a claimant falls within the class of workmen covered by the reference, that determination forms part of the merits of the dispute and is not a collateral jurisdictional fact. An erroneous finding on workman status, even if alleged, remains a decision within jurisdiction and does not attract certiorari under Article 226. On that basis, the tribunal's refusal to grant relief was not liable to writ interference, and the challenge to its decision failed. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:40:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292830 Where a tribunal is authorised under an industrial dispute reference to decide whether a claimant falls within the class of workmen covered by the reference, that determination forms part of the merits of the dispute and is not a collateral jurisdictional fact. An erroneous finding on workman status, even if alleged, remains a decision within jurisdiction and does not attract certiorari under Article 226. On that basis, the tribunal's refusal to grant relief was not liable to writ interference, and the challenge to its decision failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292830