https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292825 A prior adjudication by a competent court on the title to property directly in issue binds the parties in later litigation, so the plaintiff could not relitigate claims to the shop, godown, or related mesne profits. The text also states that property acquired with the proceeds of the earlier decree could not be recovered beyond the share proved in the plaintiff's favour, limiting relief to that extent. On redemption, the plaintiff was recognised as entitled only to redeem 7/40ths on payment of the proportionate amount within the time fixed by the decree; default would foreclose the redemption right. The decree below was therefore upheld in substance but modified to confine relief to the limited share and redemption right recognised. en-us Mon, 20 Oct 1884 00:00:00 +0521 Sat, 09 Jan 2021 10:49:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292825 A prior adjudication by a competent court on the title to property directly in issue binds the parties in later litigation, so the plaintiff could not relitigate claims to the shop, godown, or related mesne profits. The text also states that property acquired with the proceeds of the earlier decree could not be recovered beyond the share proved in the plaintiff's favour, limiting relief to that extent. On redemption, the plaintiff was recognised as entitled only to redeem 7/40ths on payment of the proportionate amount within the time fixed by the decree; default would foreclose the redemption right. The decree below was therefore upheld in substance but modified to confine relief to the limited share and redemption right recognised. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Oct 1884 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292825