https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292820 A prior decree on the same proprietary title to disputed immovable property operated as res judicata because the earlier court was competent when the first suit was instituted, and a decree obtained by a benamidar binds the beneficial owner absent contrary proof. The limitation issue also failed the plaintiffs: the claim was treated as one concerning an interest in immovable property or a periodically recurring right, and time ran from the first refusal of recognition of the asserted right. On that basis, the suit was held barred by limitation, and the lower appellate decree was set aside. en-us Wed, 07 May 1884 00:00:00 +0521 Sat, 09 Jan 2021 10:37:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292820 A prior decree on the same proprietary title to disputed immovable property operated as res judicata because the earlier court was competent when the first suit was instituted, and a decree obtained by a benamidar binds the beneficial owner absent contrary proof. The limitation issue also failed the plaintiffs: the claim was treated as one concerning an interest in immovable property or a periodically recurring right, and time ran from the first refusal of recognition of the asserted right. On that basis, the suit was held barred by limitation, and the lower appellate decree was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 May 1884 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292820