https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292798 An order directing examination under Section 196 of the Companies Act was challenged as appealable under Clause 13 of the Letters Patent. The High Court held that the order did not satisfy the test of a judgment as explained in the cited Full Bench decision, so it was not capable of supporting an appeal under that clause. The preliminary objection was upheld, the appeal was found not maintainable, and the order for examination remained undisturbed. en-us Mon, 19 Aug 1935 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2021 11:02:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292798 An order directing examination under Section 196 of the Companies Act was challenged as appealable under Clause 13 of the Letters Patent. The High Court held that the order did not satisfy the test of a judgment as explained in the cited Full Bench decision, so it was not capable of supporting an appeal under that clause. The preliminary objection was upheld, the appeal was found not maintainable, and the order for examination remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Aug 1935 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292798