https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292793 Forum allocation within the High Court depends on where the dispute substantially arises. A challenge to Original Side rules and an Assistant Master's refusal to receive a company petition was substantially connected with Bombay because the practitioner, impugned order and alleged denial of the right to practise on the Original Side were all located there. Article 227 did not apply because the Assistant Master was not a subordinate court or tribunal, while reliance on Article 226 and the Advocates Act did not alter the dispute's essential character. The petition was therefore entertainable only on the Original Side, not the Appellate Side. en-us Thu, 06 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2021 10:40:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292793 Forum allocation within the High Court depends on where the dispute substantially arises. A challenge to Original Side rules and an Assistant Master's refusal to receive a company petition was substantially connected with Bombay because the practitioner, impugned order and alleged denial of the right to practise on the Original Side were all located there. Article 227 did not apply because the Assistant Master was not a subordinate court or tribunal, while reliance on Article 226 and the Advocates Act did not alter the dispute's essential character. The petition was therefore entertainable only on the Original Side, not the Appellate Side. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292793