https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402660 The Court allowed the application, condoning the 342-day delay in filing the Tax Appeal challenging the ITAT order for Assessment Year 2007-08. The Court granted the cooperative bank one opportunity to pursue the appeal on proposed questions of law, emphasizing that the bank would not derive personal benefit. Costs of Rs. 50,000 were imposed on the bank, to be deposited with the Gujarat High Court Advocates Welfare Fund for assigning a 'pucca' number to the Tax Appeal for admission. en-us Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Feb 2021 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402660 The Court allowed the application, condoning the 342-day delay in filing the Tax Appeal challenging the ITAT order for Assessment Year 2007-08. The Court granted the cooperative bank one opportunity to pursue the appeal on proposed questions of law, emphasizing that the bank would not derive personal benefit. Costs of Rs. 50,000 were imposed on the bank, to be deposited with the Gujarat High Court Advocates Welfare Fund for assigning a 'pucca' number to the Tax Appeal for admission. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402660