https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24249 In a section 256(2) Income-tax Act application, the HC directed reference only of questions that were real questions of law arising from the Tribunal's order. Questions already covered by binding precedent, including one decided by the same HC and another by the Supreme Court, were excluded from reference. The remaining questions were treated as referable legal issues, and the Tribunal was required to draw up a statement of the case and refer only those surviving questions for the High Court's opinion. The application therefore succeeded only in part. en-us Tue, 29 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:22:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24249 In a section 256(2) Income-tax Act application, the HC directed reference only of questions that were real questions of law arising from the Tribunal's order. Questions already covered by binding precedent, including one decided by the same HC and another by the Supreme Court, were excluded from reference. The remaining questions were treated as referable legal issues, and the Tribunal was required to draw up a statement of the case and refer only those surviving questions for the High Court's opinion. The application therefore succeeded only in part. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 29 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24249