https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402648 A judicial order of the National Company Law Tribunal was treated as amenable, if at all, only to supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and not as an ordinary writ under Article 226. The availability of an effective statutory remedy under the Companies Act and Tribunal Rules, together with parallel pursuit of an appeal and writ proceedings, weighed against writ maintainability. The text also notes that suppression of material facts, non-impleadment of the Tribunal where necessary, and denial of fair opportunity to respond undermined the petition. An earlier single-judge order granting temporary deferment was held not to be a binding precedent on maintainability. en-us Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2021 04:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402648 A judicial order of the National Company Law Tribunal was treated as amenable, if at all, only to supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and not as an ordinary writ under Article 226. The availability of an effective statutory remedy under the Companies Act and Tribunal Rules, together with parallel pursuit of an appeal and writ proceedings, weighed against writ maintainability. The text also notes that suppression of material facts, non-impleadment of the Tribunal where necessary, and denial of fair opportunity to respond undermined the petition. An earlier single-judge order granting temporary deferment was held not to be a binding precedent on maintainability. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402648