<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 61 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24247</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the original petition filed by the Revenue, directing the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer legal questions regarding the treatment of the absence of partner signatures on Form No. 12 as a technical defect and the time frame for rectification to the High Court for decision. The Court emphasized the need to clarify the interpretation of statutory provisions concerning the continuation of registration for firms under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:17:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 61 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24247</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the original petition filed by the Revenue, directing the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to refer legal questions regarding the treatment of the absence of partner signatures on Form No. 12 as a technical defect and the time frame for rectification to the High Court for decision. The Court emphasized the need to clarify the interpretation of statutory provisions concerning the continuation of registration for firms under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>