<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (9) TMI 21 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24246</link>
    <description>The High Court of GAUHATI interpreted the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the rejection of a partnership firm&#039;s declaration filed late under section 184(7). The court held that the rejection order was appealable, citing precedents and provisions of the repealed Act of 1922. Emphasizing the Income-tax Officer&#039;s discretion to condone delays, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the order&#039;s appealability without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:14:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (9) TMI 21 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24246</link>
      <description>The High Court of GAUHATI interpreted the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the rejection of a partnership firm&#039;s declaration filed late under section 184(7). The court held that the rejection order was appealable, citing precedents and provisions of the repealed Act of 1922. Emphasizing the Income-tax Officer&#039;s discretion to condone delays, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the order&#039;s appealability without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>