<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1625 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292775</link>
    <description>The petition for restoration of a company&#039;s name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 was allowed by the Tribunal. Despite non-compliance with filing financial statements and annual returns, the company demonstrated ongoing business activities through possession of industrial land. Both the Registrar of Companies and the Income Tax Department supported restoration. The company was directed to fulfill specified requirements within timelines, with consequences for non-compliance outlined. The judgment emphasized legal provisions, factual circumstances, and regulatory compliance, ensuring due process and accountability in resolving the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 01:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1625 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292775</link>
      <description>The petition for restoration of a company&#039;s name in the Register of Companies under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 was allowed by the Tribunal. Despite non-compliance with filing financial statements and annual returns, the company demonstrated ongoing business activities through possession of industrial land. Both the Registrar of Companies and the Income Tax Department supported restoration. The company was directed to fulfill specified requirements within timelines, with consequences for non-compliance outlined. The judgment emphasized legal provisions, factual circumstances, and regulatory compliance, ensuring due process and accountability in resolving the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>