https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292785 The HC allowed the writ petition challenging disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, and DIN deactivation, referencing a prior order. The Court set aside the disqualification, reinstated the petitioners' DINs, and permitted them to act as Directors in active companies. The Registrar retained authority to address post-01.04.2014 violations and Rule 11 breaches. Petitioners may pursue alternative remedies if aggrieved by company striking off under Section 248. All writ petitions were allowed, and miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs. en-us Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292785 The HC allowed the writ petition challenging disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, and DIN deactivation, referencing a prior order. The Court set aside the disqualification, reinstated the petitioners' DINs, and permitted them to act as Directors in active companies. The Registrar retained authority to address post-01.04.2014 violations and Rule 11 breaches. Petitioners may pursue alternative remedies if aggrieved by company striking off under Section 248. All writ petitions were allowed, and miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292785