https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292772 An order under Section 507 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act was upheld because it required occupiers to afford only reasonable facilities to the owners for compliance with the municipal requisition, and that standard could be assessed by reference to tenant convenience and a phased repair programme based on an architect's report. The Court also stated that a tribunal whose order is challenged is ordinarily a necessary party to the writ petition, and all persons affected should be joined. It added that a tribunal should not usually appear merely to submit to orders, and if it does so, it should ordinarily bear its own costs; however, the existing limited costs order was left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 18 Feb 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jan 2021 17:38:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292772 An order under Section 507 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act was upheld because it required occupiers to afford only reasonable facilities to the owners for compliance with the municipal requisition, and that standard could be assessed by reference to tenant convenience and a phased repair programme based on an architect's report. The Court also stated that a tribunal whose order is challenged is ordinarily a necessary party to the writ petition, and all persons affected should be joined. It added that a tribunal should not usually appear merely to submit to orders, and if it does so, it should ordinarily bear its own costs; however, the existing limited costs order was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Feb 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292772