https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292771 A Panchayati Adalat constituted under the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 was treated as a court subordinate to the High Court for contempt purposes because it exercised statutory adjudicatory powers and its orders were subject to limited supervisory correction. The article also states that Article 227 preserves broader judicial superintendence, including control over excess or wrongful assumption of jurisdiction and correction where jurisdiction is wrongly declined. It further explains that publication concerning pending proceedings can amount to contempt if it presents disputed matters as settled facts and is likely to prejudice fair adjudication, even before the hearing is concluded; apologies may affect the sanction imposed. en-us Wed, 21 Feb 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jan 2021 17:31:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292771 A Panchayati Adalat constituted under the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 was treated as a court subordinate to the High Court for contempt purposes because it exercised statutory adjudicatory powers and its orders were subject to limited supervisory correction. The article also states that Article 227 preserves broader judicial superintendence, including control over excess or wrongful assumption of jurisdiction and correction where jurisdiction is wrongly declined. It further explains that publication concerning pending proceedings can amount to contempt if it presents disputed matters as settled facts and is likely to prejudice fair adjudication, even before the hearing is concluded; apologies may affect the sanction imposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Feb 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292771