<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 209 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402617</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that common area maintenance charges were not subject to TDS under section 194-I but rather under section 194C, as they were distinct from rent and governed by separate agreements. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of specific agreements in applying TDS provisions, overruling the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 209 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402617</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, determining that common area maintenance charges were not subject to TDS under section 194-I but rather under section 194C, as they were distinct from rent and governed by separate agreements. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of specific agreements in applying TDS provisions, overruling the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>