https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402601 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's revisional application under Article 227 challenging the National Company Law Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal seeking restoration of the petitioner's name in the Register of Companies. The Court held that interference under Article 227 is limited to specific circumstances and that the petitioner's remedy lies in filing an appeal under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Court directed the petitioner to pursue the appeal before the National Company Law Tribunal for appropriate redressal. en-us Fri, 28 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:27:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402601 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's revisional application under Article 227 challenging the National Company Law Tribunal's decision to dismiss the appeal seeking restoration of the petitioner's name in the Register of Companies. The Court held that interference under Article 227 is limited to specific circumstances and that the petitioner's remedy lies in filing an appeal under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Court directed the petitioner to pursue the appeal before the National Company Law Tribunal for appropriate redressal. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 28 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402601