https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402597 The Tribunal allowed for the restoration of the company's name in the register of companies under section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013. The appellant, a Shareholder and Director, successfully argued for restoration based on the company's intention to resume business activities, ownership of crucial property, and willingness to comply with necessary filings and fees. The Tribunal ordered the company to fulfill specified requirements, pay fines, and ensure compliance with restoration directives, emphasizing the need for adherence to the Companies Fresh Start Scheme post-revival. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:25:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402597 The Tribunal allowed for the restoration of the company's name in the register of companies under section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013. The appellant, a Shareholder and Director, successfully argued for restoration based on the company's intention to resume business activities, ownership of crucial property, and willingness to comply with necessary filings and fees. The Tribunal ordered the company to fulfill specified requirements, pay fines, and ensure compliance with restoration directives, emphasizing the need for adherence to the Companies Fresh Start Scheme post-revival. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402597