https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292767 Section 87 of the Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 was read broadly to preserve the law in force in the new State of Gujarat, and that continuity was held to include pre-appointed-day decisions of the Bombay High Court. The Court rejected a narrow territorial approach that would have treated reorganisation as extinguishing existing binding precedent, and instead emphasised legal continuity, certainty, and the statute's purpose. Pre-reorganisation Bombay High Court decisions therefore continued to bind the Gujarat High Court unless displaced by competent legislation or later binding authority. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:16:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292767 Section 87 of the Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 was read broadly to preserve the law in force in the new State of Gujarat, and that continuity was held to include pre-appointed-day decisions of the Bombay High Court. The Court rejected a narrow territorial approach that would have treated reorganisation as extinguishing existing binding precedent, and instead emphasised legal continuity, certainty, and the statute's purpose. Pre-reorganisation Bombay High Court decisions therefore continued to bind the Gujarat High Court unless displaced by competent legislation or later binding authority. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jul 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292767