<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 178 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402586</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a recovery notice was disposed of after notice was accepted and the respondents stated that no further action would be taken under the impugned notice until the petitioner&#039;s stay application in the pending appeal was considered. The operative effect was a temporary restraint on enforcement of the recovery notice, pending decision on stay in the appellate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:09:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 178 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402586</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a recovery notice was disposed of after notice was accepted and the respondents stated that no further action would be taken under the impugned notice until the petitioner&#039;s stay application in the pending appeal was considered. The operative effect was a temporary restraint on enforcement of the recovery notice, pending decision on stay in the appellate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=402586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>