https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56215 Importantly, a contract for manufacture simpliciter is not a works contract under the definition provided under Section 2(k) - It is a settled law that the interpretation of contracts in such cases shall generally not be done in the writ jurisdiction. Further, the mere fact that the Gujarat Act might apply may not be sufficient for the writ courts to entertain the plea of Respondent No. 1 to challenge the ruling of the arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act. - The High Court erred in utilizing its discretionary power available under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution herein- SC en-us Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:04:23 +0530 Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:04:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56215 Importantly, a contract for manufacture simpliciter is not a works contract under the definition provided under Section 2(k) - It is a settled law that the interpretation of contracts in such cases shall generally not be done in the writ jurisdiction. Further, the mere fact that the Gujarat Act might apply may not be sufficient for the writ courts to entertain the plea of Respondent No. 1 to challenge the ruling of the arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act. - The High Court erred in utilizing its discretionary power available under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution herein- SC Highlights Indian Laws Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:04:23 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=56215