<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1842 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292754</link>
    <description>The appeal was restored as it was dismissed based solely on a monetary limit without considering the case&#039;s merits. The issue of eligibility for Cenvat Credit on Hotel Bills was central to the appeal. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing consistency in decisions and the importance of documentary evidence. The decision was influenced by a previous favorable ruling in a similar case, highlighting the significance of legal precedents and factual evidence in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:02:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=632332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1842 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292754</link>
      <description>The appeal was restored as it was dismissed based solely on a monetary limit without considering the case&#039;s merits. The issue of eligibility for Cenvat Credit on Hotel Bills was central to the appeal. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing consistency in decisions and the importance of documentary evidence. The decision was influenced by a previous favorable ruling in a similar case, highlighting the significance of legal precedents and factual evidence in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>