https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292747 The Supreme Court held that disputes between private individuals regarding property rights should be resolved through regular suits, not writ petitions under Article 226, unless involving a violation of statutory duty by a statutory authority. The Court emphasized that writ jurisdiction is not meant to replace ordinary remedies. The High Court erred in granting relief through the writ petition, and the appeal was allowed. The impugned judgment was set aside, and the writ petition was dismissed with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 19 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jan 2021 15:43:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292747 The Supreme Court held that disputes between private individuals regarding property rights should be resolved through regular suits, not writ petitions under Article 226, unless involving a violation of statutory duty by a statutory authority. The Court emphasized that writ jurisdiction is not meant to replace ordinary remedies. The High Court erred in granting relief through the writ petition, and the appeal was allowed. The impugned judgment was set aside, and the writ petition was dismissed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292747