https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292745 Section 99 of the Agra Tenancy Act, 1926 was treated as creating a substantive statutory remedy and, absent clear legislative intent, it was construed prospectively only. Because the alleged wrongful dispossession occurred before 7 September 1926, the earlier civil right of suit was regarded as an accrued vested right that could not be displaced by implication. On that construction, Section 99 did not govern the dispute and the civil court's jurisdiction was not barred by Section 230. en-us Tue, 04 Aug 1931 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292745 Section 99 of the Agra Tenancy Act, 1926 was treated as creating a substantive statutory remedy and, absent clear legislative intent, it was construed prospectively only. Because the alleged wrongful dispossession occurred before 7 September 1926, the earlier civil right of suit was regarded as an accrued vested right that could not be displaced by implication. On that construction, Section 99 did not govern the dispute and the civil court's jurisdiction was not barred by Section 230. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Aug 1931 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292745