https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116950 Dispute whether intermediary marketing services supplied from Hyderabad to a Singapore company attract IGST or CGST+SGST. One argument fixes place of supply at supplier location and treats the transaction as intra state, supporting CGST+SGST; an opposing argument treats such supplies as inter state under the inter jurisdictional rule, supporting IGST. The conflict between statutory provisions and non binding administrative guidance creates legal ambiguity, and participants advise seeking formal clarification. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 2021 19:40:03 +0530 Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116950 Dispute whether intermediary marketing services supplied from Hyderabad to a Singapore company attract IGST or CGST+SGST. One argument fixes place of supply at supplier location and treats the transaction as intra state, supporting CGST+SGST; an opposing argument treats such supplies as inter state under the inter jurisdictional rule, supporting IGST. The conflict between statutory provisions and non binding administrative guidance creates legal ambiguity, and participants advise seeking formal clarification. Discussion-Forum GST Wed, 06 Jan 2021 19:40:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116950